Nothing’s The Matter: Project 180, Day 48

Nothing really matters. I guide kids through all sorts of things. Some of it registers with them. Some of it–If I am lucky–even resonates with them. But most of the things we encounter together are just experiences, and as we know, as experiences become memory, it is not the thing that’s carried; it’s the feeling. So no thing really matters in the end.

But everyone does. Every one I teach matters. And how they feel from their experience with me is–I believe–a better mark than any label of of learning attached to any thing I “teach” them. So, I teach ones, not things.

What does that look like? It’s not fully in focus for me yet, but as I continue through the Project 180 process of do-reflect-do better, I believe things are coming into view, and as I try to zoom in on the finer details, I keep coming to the place of humanizing the experience, for that focuses on the ones I teach, not the things I teach, which seem to come from that place of standardizing the experience. And when we come to that place, we find ourselves disconnected and the things become the “every,” not the ones, and we lose sight of our why, which should be who, not what. And so, I focus on the one.

And though I may never fully find the answer on my journey, I have come to accept that everyone I teach matters more than anything I teach, and that has changed the experience–for everyone.

Happy Tuesday, all.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

I Am Not Their Landlord: Project 180, Day 47

“For they will get to carry with them the humanizing experience of inhabiting a space that belongs to them, a space they are willing to invest in and improve upon for they see themselves as benefactors of commitment, not merely subjects of compliance.”

New quarter today. Same kids. Two “teacher-paced” classes and one “self-paced” class. Not sure when we will make a transition to a hybrid model with Covid numbers, but for now, it will be much the same as last quarter. And though I have made some adjustments after reflecting on our first-quarter experience, I am hoping for a big change in regard to kids’ having a better understanding of how I approach learning.

A few picked it up right away last quarter, but many seemed uncertain about my approach. And why wouldn’t they? A decade of being conditioned in the system, many found the notion of their having a voice in determining the final judgment of their learning a foreign idea. Oh, I don’t think they didn’t understand it; I just don’t think they trusted it or me. Nothing personal of course, and I did not take their distrust personally. It’s new. It’s a little radical. And such things take awhile to warm up to. For some, that “warmth” never occurred as they have continued–despite my reassurances–to worry about the score in Skyward. So, I sent out another assurance yesterday afternoon, trying again to put their minds at ease.

Trust takes time. And in this distance situation, it takes even more time and messaging. But, for many, as I have learned from their “Learning Letters,” they are starting to warm to the idea that we are partners in this. They are beginning to trust it and me. And I think on some level they are beginning to trust themselves. They are beginning to see themselves as owners of their learning. And as owners, not renters, they get to make decisions. They get to build equity. For they will get to carry with them the humanizing experience of inhabiting a space that belongs to them, a space they are willing to invest in and improve upon for they see themselves as benefactors of commitment, not merely subjects of compliance.

Happy Monday, all.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

Later Loser: Project 180, Day 46

I miss the kids. I miss the kidding. I was reminded of this yesterday when I got a chance to call one of my kiddos a loser.

Strange thing the “loser test.” But I have always used it as a measure of sorts for my connections with kids. No, I do not call all my kids losers. Of course, I don’t. There are other things to call them, too. Okay, I’m kidding around some about kidding with kids. But I do kid with kids. Right thing to do? I don’t know. But I’m not sure it’s wrong either. I am not sure there’s a script for human interaction. I don’t mean it meanly, and my kids know this. Professionally appropriate? Maybe not. And perhaps I don’t have the right of it. But it feels real. And that can’t all be wrong. And though it may sound odd to say it feels right, if I am honest, it does. My world felt right yesterday. For a moment it felt like we were back in the classroom and wrongs of the world without were washed away. And there was nothing wrong with that.

Happy Friday, all. Have a great weekend.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

Where’s the Learner?: project 180, Day 45

She is sitting right in front of me. It was her work that led us here in the first place, and at this place it seems an affront not to include her voice in something so personal, something so complex.

My first step into my “changing education” journey was focused on grading. Unsettled by the “grade game,” I sought to change the game by focusing on learning–not grading, which led to that radical first step in year one where I gave every student an A for the year. Since then, my journey has taken me along a number of paths as I have explored ways to push grading aside in order to let learning have–to let learners take–center stage. Below is the message I shared with them yesterday as I presented my “select-and-support” approach to grading.

Their learning. Their story. This is where I have landed in principle and in practice. I ask the kids to take the lead on determining their final grade in what I have come to call a “Learning Letter.”

This, of course, is not a new idea in the Project 180 Classroom. It, in general, has been the approach since year two. This is just the latest form it has taken. This is latest path I am on to focus on the learner in the learning.

Of course, some raise a brow at such an approach, suggesting I am undermining the integrity of the system, and even committing malpractice as I am the one who is qualified to measure learning. Yes, I have the title of teacher, and, yes, I guide the learning experiences, but I question–fervently and frequently–if I alone am solely qualified to judge learning, especially within the confines of the system’s conventional approach to labeling learning and learners. It seems the oft forgotten element in this is the learner. How can I not look to this primary source? She is sitting right in front of me. It was her work that led us here in the first place, and at this place it seems an affront not to include her voice in something so personal, something so complex. I have to include her. And so I do.

So, have I found the way? Of course not. I will never find it. The territory is too vast. But at the end, when I come to rest, I will look back upon my journey, and I will say with confidence that I tried. This is just my latest in a long list of tries to find the learner in the learning.

Happy Thursday, all.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

Maybe Tomorrow: Project 180, Day 44

Morning, all. Bowing out today. WiFi’s wonky. Not enough time. Too much on plate. Looks like I’m going to need permission to pause again. Sorry. Maybe tomorrow I will get back on track. Take care.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

Permission to Pause: Project 180, Day 43

Morning, all. Gonna ask for permission to pause the “Trash Talk” series this morning. (Eek, might be I could have picked a better title). Either way, things are piling up more than usual with end of term this week, and I need to turn my attention to other matters, so with that, I am going to push the pause button for today (and maybe tomorrow). Hopefully you understand. No one probably wants to hear me talk trash again today anyway.

Happy Tuesday, all. Thank you for understanding. Sorry.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

Time (Trash Talk, Part 2): Project 180, Day 42

I once–twice actually (in person)–heard Kelly Gallagher say, “Writing is never done; it’s only due.” And though I am not certain this originated from him, I heard it from him, and it stuck. Writing is only due. But, beyond the due, which I believe we get too fixated on in education, is the never done, which means it can always be better. And this is where I focus. On the better.

Our writing can always be better. But better takes time, and better takes feedback. For our inexperienced writers, who often lack confidence and enthusiasm for writing, it takes a lot of time, and it takes a lot of feedback. And this is where I think we fall short in our instruction. We don’t give enough time, and we don’t give enough feedback. And though there are things–the calendar for one–that we cannot control, there are things we can.

First, we can give fewer writing assignments (some classrooms boast as many as five to seven “full-process” essays in a semester). To me that’s a focus on writing, not the writer. I suppose the argument would be the volume translates into better writing, but I am not convinced it equals better writers. Maybe better “transactors” who follow the formula and regard the rubric for a good grade. In short, they become better at the game, and then we cry foul, when they only care about the grade in the end. But it’s the game we have asked them to play if we are honest. How much writing then should we assign? I assign no more than one major piece per quarter, two per semester. Why? Simple. Time. Writing is first–and I believe foremost–a creative endeavor. Writing is creating, not completing. But when we focus on due dates and volume, it becomes about completing, even if we don’t mean it to. And completing becomes about the grade. What reward or punishment have they earned? Oh we can scoff at the notion, but isn’t that what our kids have come to believe about the transactional nature of their writing experiences?

On the on the other hand, creating becomes about the creator and the process. It becomes about the volume of time, not the volume of writing. So, we have to give our kids time to live in their writing, sustained by the time we allow and the feedback we feed. But, and I think this is important, even in this time-abundant space we offer, the goal is better writers, not good writing. Our kids come to us all over the map in terms of their perceptions and abilities with writing. And as we seek to guide them each to better, we cannot expect that dogged allegiance to good products can happen without better process. And that is where I believe the sweet spot can be found for each of our writers, but it begins with time. We have to give them time. We have to give ourselves time. That is the first thing we have to do.

Speaking of time, I am out of it this morning. I will continue the conversation tomorrow.

Happy Monday, all.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.